Is one man or a group of men controlling others the best way to function in a society?

Thousands of years ago, the first man was offended and sought revenge for the offence created against him; it was in this was that clans were formed, as he gathered people against his offender and the offender then sought revenge for the increased violence that was taken upon him and so he gathered a larger clan to revenge what he felt was an unfair retaliation to his offence. Men rose up as leaders in these clans and they wanted payment for working for those whom wanted their protection. Finally these men began to work almost full time to become skilled enough against their adversaries, so that they would not die in battle: as men began to pillage those who the felt they could advantage themselves by. While we can not be absolutely sure of the details, as to the first offence and how it took place, we can with great probability say that what we know today as governments: were formed by men who felt the need to protect themselves against others that would try and take advantage of them.





But was there another option that could have created a different, better result, than the one we currently find ourselves oppressed by? WHAT ABOUT FORGIVENESS?Is one man or a group of men controlling others the best way to function in a society?
of course there is a secret society, without it we would be living in paradise, but that is no good to those who crave power hence this cesspool in which we live.Is one man or a group of men controlling others the best way to function in a society?
sorry, but leader-less groups do not exist. even primitive tribes have a chief. B/c when hunting as a group is easier than alone, and group requires coordination.





forgiveness and sharing only works when somebody else is providing for you.
Your History is pitiful -- Blessings
YAWWWN, that almost did it...tell me another
no. but i think you already knew the answer to that one.